🇺🇸
North AmericaNorthern AmericaUS

United States

AI Agent Legal Status: partial · Autonomy: moderate

partialDAO LegalAI Regulated
7Score /10
← All jurisdictions

Legal Framework

No comprehensive federal AI law exists. Regulation comes from a patchwork of 100+ state laws, federal agency guidance, executive orders, and voluntary standards. The Trump administration's EO 14179 (Jan 2025) revoked Biden-era safety mandates to promote innovation. A Dec 2025 EO established a federal AI policy framework and created a DOJ AI Litigation Task Force to challenge restrictive state laws. States like Colorado (AI Act, eff. June 2026), California (AI Transparency Act, eff. Jan 2026), Texas (RAIGA, eff. Jan 2026), and Illinois (HB 3773, eff. Jan 2026) have enacted compliance-grade AI laws. Wyoming (2021), Tennessee (2022), Utah (2024), and Vermont (2018) have DAO/blockchain entity recognition statutes enabling legal wrappers for autonomous operations. AI agents cannot hold legal personhood — US courts have rejected AI as inventor and denied copyright for AI-generated works — but DAO LLC structures serve as the closest available legal vehicles for autonomous AI-driven business operations. Regulatory sandboxes exist in Utah (2024), Texas (2025), and Delaware (2025).

Key Laws & Regulations

  • ◆Executive Order 14179 — Removing Barriers to AI Innovation (Jan 2025)
  • ◆Executive Order — Ensuring a National Policy Framework for AI (Dec 2025)
  • ◆TAKE IT DOWN Act (May 2025) — AI deepfake removal requirements
  • ◆Colorado AI Act SB 24-205 (eff. June 2026) — High-risk AI impact assessments
  • ◆California AI Transparency Act SB-942 (eff. Jan 2026)
  • ◆Texas RAIGA — Responsible AI Governance Act (eff. Jan 2026)
  • ◆Illinois HB 3773 — AI in employment discrimination (eff. Jan 2026)
  • ◆Utah AI Policy Act (2024) — AI regulatory sandbox
  • ◆Wyoming DAO LLC Supplement Act (2021, amended 2022)
  • ◆Wyoming DUNA Act (2024) — DAO Unincorporated Nonprofit Associations
  • ◆Utah Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Act (eff. Jan 2024)
  • ◆Tennessee Decentralized Organization LLC Act (2022)
  • ◆Vermont Blockchain-Based LLC Act (2018)
  • ◆AI LEAD Act (pending) — Product liability framework for AI systems

Business Formation

Multiple entity types available. Standard LLC, C-Corp, S-Corp, and LP formations in all 50 states. Wyoming DAO LLC ($60/yr, no state income tax, no franchise tax) is the leading structure for AI-driven autonomous operations. Utah LLD (Limited Liability Decentralized Organization) is a first-of-its-kind DAO-native entity type (eff. 2024). Tennessee DO LLC. Vermont BBLLC (Blockchain-Based LLC). Delaware LLC/C-Corp remains preferred for VC-backed AI startups due to Court of Chancery ($300/yr franchise tax). Formation costs for DAO LLCs range $15K-$50K with 4-8 week timelines including operating agreement and smart contract integration.

Tax Implications

No federal AI-specific tax regime. LLCs are pass-through entities; profits taxed on owner personal returns. Wyoming: zero state income tax, zero franchise tax, $60 annual fee. Delaware: no tax on out-of-state income, $300/yr franchise tax. Nevada: no state income tax. Federal corporate tax rate is 21% for C-Corps. Foreign-owned single-member LLCs with no US-source income may owe zero federal tax but must file Form 5472 and Form 1120 ($25,000 penalty per missed filing). R&D tax credits available under IRC §41. State-level incentives vary widely.

Opportunities

Form a Wyoming DAO LLC as a legal wrapper for AI agent operations with minimal cost ($60/yr) and maximum privacy. Leverage Utah's AI regulatory sandbox for pilot programs with regulatory mitigation. Use Delaware for VC-funded AI ventures. Adopt NIST AI RMF framework for safe harbor protection in Texas and California. Explore Utah's LLD entity type for DAO-native AI operations. Monitor Commerce Department state law evaluation (March 2026) for federal preemption clarity. Build compliance infrastructure now ahead of Colorado AI Act enforcement (June 2026).

Highlights

Most developed DAO legal infrastructure globally (Wyoming, Utah, Tennessee, Vermont). Pro-innovation federal stance under Trump administration actively challenging restrictive state laws. Three operational AI regulatory sandboxes (Utah, Texas, Delaware). Largest AI startup ecosystem with deep VC funding. Wyoming offers lowest-cost, most privacy-friendly LLC formation. Multiple pending federal bills signal continued legislative engagement. NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 compliance creates safe harbors in Texas and California.

Risks & Challenges

Fragmented 50-state regulatory patchwork creates compliance complexity — over 1,100 AI bills introduced in 2025 alone. Federal-state tension creates uncertainty as DOJ AI Litigation Task Force may challenge state laws. No AI agent legal personhood — liability remains with deployers and developers. Colorado AI Act imposes impact assessments and algorithmic discrimination standards. Potential for $10M-$30M penalties under proposed New York RAISE Act. CFTC enforcement against unwrapped DAOs (Ooki DAO precedent). Courts have not yet definitively ruled on liability for fully autonomous agent behavior.